Ripple’s Institutional Business Is Expanding—But Is XRP Benefiting?
Estimated Reading Time: 4 minutes
Don’t invest unless you’re prepared to lose all the money you invest. This is a high-risk investment and you are unlikely to be protected if something goes wrong. Take 2 minutes to learn more
Ripple is making fresh inroads into traditional finance, with partnerships involving Standard Chartered, LMAX Group, DriveWealth and Meritz Securities. The developments point to growing institutional interest in digital-asset custody, stablecoin settlement and tokenized financial products. However, a crucial question remains for XRP investors: will Ripple’s expanding business create meaningful demand for XRP itself?
Institutional Partnerships Strengthen Ripple’s Position
On October 12, Standard Chartered announced that it had launched institutional custody for Ripple USD (RLUSD) on the XRP Ledger (XRPL). The bank is also working with Ripple and LMAX Group on a planned arrangement that would allow RLUSD to serve as eligible collateral for selected trading products. The initiative could help institutions manage digital assets more efficiently, although further implementation steps remain.
Two days later, Ripple announced a partnership with DriveWealth, a brokerage infrastructure provider serving financial technology companies and other partners. The collaboration includes plans for RLUSD settlement, cross-border payments and digital-asset custody, beginning with European operations before a potential US expansion.
Ripple also partnered with South Korean securities firm Meritz Securities to explore institutional custody and tokenization. The companies intend to investigate how Ripple’s infrastructure could support digital-asset services as South Korea’s regulatory framework develops. However, the announcement does not confirm that Meritz has launched a product using XRP.
Together, these developments suggest that Ripple is expanding its reach into financial infrastructure rather than relying solely on cryptocurrency trading.
The XRP Investment Case Is More Complicated
Growing institutional adoption could benefit Ripple’s business, but XRP holders should distinguish between demand for Ripple’s services and demand for the XRP token.
RLUSD, Ripple’s US dollar-pegged stablecoin, is designed to maintain a stable value relative to the dollar. XRP, by contrast, is the native asset of the XRP Ledger and can be used for transaction fees and other network functions.
Institutions can adopt Ripple’s custody products or use RLUSD without necessarily purchasing or holding significant amounts of XRP. Consequently, more partnerships do not automatically translate into higher XRP demand.
The economic impact will depend on how these services are implemented, which assets they use and whether they generate sustained activity on the XRP Ledger.
Source: create.vista.com / cryptosignals
Network Growth Offers Encouraging Signals
Despite that distinction, the broader XRPL ecosystem has recorded meaningful growth. CoinDesk reported that average tokenized-asset balances on the ledger reached approximately $3.72 billion in the second quarter of 2026, while average RLUSD balances stood at about $539 million. Combined, these figures represented roughly $4.26 billion in value held on the network.
However, the same report found that daily accounts initiating order-book trades fell by around 40% year over year, even as average daily order-book trading volume increased by 79%. This suggests that trading activity became more concentrated among fewer accounts rather than expanding uniformly across the network.
For investors, the mixed figures reinforce the need to look beyond headline adoption statistics.
What XRP Investors Should Watch
The next important indicators include actual XRP transaction demand, sustained XRPL activity, the growth of tokenized assets and evidence that institutional integrations have progressed from announcements to live services.
Regulatory developments and competition from other blockchain networks could also influence adoption.
Ripple’s institutional expansion strengthens the case that its technology has a role in the future of digital finance. But the investment case for XRP depends on a more specific question: how much of that growth ultimately requires or creates lasting economic demand for the token?
